Potential Hazards of Low Carbohydrate Diets


While most of the criticisms I have heard about a low carb intake are scientifically invalid, I wanted to diligently search for any real potential hazards before committing myself and my husband to such a diet for an indefinite period of time.

There is a significant lack of study about this type of diet, especially in relation to searching for adverse consequences. I based my research, then, on any studies that could relate to the same metabolic processes taking place as those in the low carb diet, looking for any negative effects that might extrapolate to this diet.

The criticisms that have potential scientific validity are the following:

(a) excessive protein in the diet can lead to loss of calcium in the urine, which comes from the bones, resulting in osteoporosis

(b) ketosis can be hazardous if it is ongoing for long periods


Excessive Protein

When the body uses protein for energy it does so by breaking the chemical bonds between its components, which are amino acids and nitrogen. The amino acids can be recycled for later use, but with high protein intakes, some of the amino acids are also disposed of. This process creates some molecules that are acids, or have a positive electrical charge, which must be excreted via the kidneys. There are also inorganic ions in meat which are acidic and which circulate to the kidneys for disposal.

The body likes chemical neutrality overall, so it compensates for an acid load by releasing both bicarbonate and calcium from the bones, which are known to be the body's buffering system. As the kidneys restore balance in the system by excreting the acids, some of the calcium ions will get excreted along with them. The net result then can be loss of calcium from the bone mass, which can result in osteoporosis, or thinning of the bones.

This topic was discussed in depth at the symposium of the Nutrition Working Group of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, in Cincinnati, OH on September 10, 1997, and numerous scientific studies were presented. As typical with "gray" areas of science, the answer to the question, "Does excess dietary protein adversely affect bone?" was given as both "Yes" and "No".

The researcher who answered "No " rephrased the question to, "Are protein intakes at the upper end of the range likely to be found in the population harmful?" and provided evidence that In most observational studies, as protein intake went up, so did calcium intake. When adjustment for calcium intake was made, most of the time the positive association between protein intake and fractures disappeared.

More specific evidence was given by the "Yes" camp.

My final conclusion is that an unlimited protein intake that satisfies an individual's hunger in a low carb diet should not be hazardous, however, there is no benefit, and can be a potential hazard, to ingesting large amounts of additional protein (beyond that which satisfies normal hunger) such as with supplemental pills or powders.


Ketosis

A ketogenic diet has been used for nearly 70 years to treat seizures in children - initially before medications were available, and currently for those cases in which medications are not effective. In articles relating the use of this diet, no adverse effects are indicated, however, no specific adverse effects are looked for either.

Interestingly, calcium loss and osteoporosis as noted in (a) above is likely a greater concern with ketosis than it is with excessive protein. I base this statement both on scientific knowledge and the results of one small study I encountered in my research.

First of all, the loss of calcium due to ketosis is complex but scientifically sound. Ketosis is a state in which up to five times the normal nighttime levels of ketones are present in the bloodstream. Ketones are acids, which are molecules with a positive charge. As explained above, the body likes chemical neutrality overall, so it compensates by producing more bicarbonate, which has a negative charge. The presence of bicarbonate in turn may cause release of other positively charged molecules, which includes calcium, and which may come from the bones. (Again, the emphasis indicates this statement is based on theory).

At the kidney, which selectively excretes charged molecules (ions) to restore neutral balance, calcium ions may be excreted along with the ketones. The overall result is a loss of calcium from the bones which, over extended periods of time, can lead to osteoporosis or thinning of the bones.

I found only one study which appears to confirm this process, and this is a very small study in which six adolescents who had weights greater than 200% of ideal body weight were placed on a very low calorie diet which produced ongoing ketosis. Specific testing at regular intervals revealed all six subject to have an increase in calcium excretion in the urine as well as a decrease in total body bone mineral content, despite the intake of calcium and vitamin D supplements. Bone mineral content was measured by a DEXA scanner, which is a reliable method.

When these same subject were provided 90 grams of carbohydrate daily, frequent testing revealed the absence of ketosis, and urinary calcium at normal levels. After a short period of time the bone mineral density also returned to baseline.

This finding does not tell us whether the same effect would be seen in individuals who were consuming a normal quantity of total calories. However, since the calcium loss is apparently associated with ketosis, we must consider the possibility that an ongoing state of ketosis with any dietary intake could likely cause the same result.

Admittedly, this is a single study of a very small population, which limits its scientific relevance. However, when it comes to scientific evidence, absence of proof is not proof of absence. As a scientist, I must consider that even such a small study should be considered, especially because its outcome agrees with what in theory could occur. It is for this reason that I believe that ongoing ketosis should be avoided.

This is especially important for women, because many of them will experience calcium loss from the bones and resulting osteoporosis after menopause. This process is well documented and is somehow related to the lack of estrogen.

It has long been advised that women in their 30's ensure that they receive 1200 mg of calcium daily, with supplements if necessary, in order to maintain their bone mass prior to undergoing menopause. DEXA scans to measure bone density are recommended for women within the first five years of menopause in order to assess their risk of osteoporisis. This is especially important now that treatments are available to prevent and even reverse bone loss.

Because of the indication that ketosis may be a factor related to bone loss, I believe it is advisable for any woman on a maintenance low carb diet to consider having a DEXA scan. Just because these studies have not been performed yet does not mean we must ignore the possibilities, especially with a condition that may already be a risk for many women.


Conclusion - How to avoid potential hazards of low carb diets

In "DIET TRUTHS REVEALED: The IDEAL DIET for Human Health" the known scientific facts about human nutrition and metabolism are presented in layman's terms, explaining why low carbohydrate diets are the healthiest for most people.

The issue of ketosis is discussed in detail, and is the basis for the recommendation of an intake of 90 grams of carbohydrate daily. Detailed explanations are provided as to why this still allows for weight loss, appetite control, and healthy cholesterol levels in most persons. More information about the book

In addition, you can download articles that appeared in The IDEAL DIET Newsletter on the topics of ketosis and osteoporisis. Check out the following:

Pub. 22. "Valid and Invalid Criticisms of Low Carbohydrate Diets -- Protein Intake and Bone Loss; Osteoporosis - Risk Factors, Screening, Treatment and Prevention"

Pub. 23. "Ketosis - Safe or Not?"

You can also get information on many other topics about the low carb diet and the controversy that surrounds it.


Top of page

Home

(c) copyright 2000 Jan McBride, M.D.

 

Protein Power dietPaleolithic diet
 

 

 

HOME

Answer Critics of
Low Carb Diets

Compare popular
low carb plans

Low carb diets
and cholesterol

Why doctors reject
low carb diets